Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
17th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, IMCOM 2023 ; 2023.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2269600

ABSTRACT

Everyone understands the necessity of health management, especially in light of the COVID-19 viral infection. How to care for and manage health has emerged as the main topic of conversation, whether it concerns the elderly, adults, patients, or children. There are numerous ways to maintain one's health, and smartwatches are good at doing this because their owners can monitor their health constantly. The idea behind a smartwatch is to utilise its green light to measure the wearer's blood pressure before gathering information about their health. Because smartwatches can constantly detect and analyse users' daily health information. Users or guardians can use this information to take care of their bodies;therefore, they are an excellent choice for many people with dementia, depression, high-stress conditions, and athletes who need to monitor their physical fitness. This article analyses in depth the value of smartwatches, their applications for managing people's health, and their benefits and drawbacks. © 2023 IEEE.

2.
Radiotherapy and Oncology ; 174(Supplement 1):S26-S27, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2132763

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To report final results of a clinical trial of APBI using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to deliver 27 Gy in 5 daily fractions following breast conserving surgery (BCS) prospectively designed to assess the efficacy and cosmetic outcomes of a oneweek, APBI regimen among women with early breast cancer. Material(s) and Method(s): Women >= 50 years, with lymph nodenegative, ER positive, HER-2 negative breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), <= 3cm diameter, following BCS with margins >= 2mm, and excellent or good baseline cosmesis received 27 Gy in 5 daily fractions to the seroma plus 1 cm CTV and 0.7 cm PTV margins. Clinical photographs, patient and provider cosmetic scores, breast fibrosis, telangiectasia and pain were collected prospectively, prior to RT and at 6 weeks, 1 and 2 years after RT. The primary endpoint was the proportion of women who retained Excellent or Good cosmesis at 2 years using the EORTC Cosmetic Rating System. Cosmetic failure was deterioration from Excellent or Good to Fair or Poor. A panel of 5 radiation oncologists independently assessed the cosmetic photographs. Secondary endpoints were rates and grades of breast fibrosis, telangiectasia, breast pain, ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBRT), overall (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and subsequent mastectomy. Efficacy outcomes were assessed at clinic visits and by review of charts. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02681107. Result(s): A total of 298 patients were treated between April 25, 2016, and October 31, 2019. At a median follow-up of 48 months, the four-year OS was 98.5% (95% CI 96.1% - 99.5%) and BCSS was 99.7% (95% CI 97.6% - 99.9%). The four-year IBRT rate was 3.3% (95% CI 1.1% - 6.4%). There were 10 contralateral breast events for a four-year rate of 3.9% (95% CI 2.2% - 6.9%). There were 10 ipsilateral and six contralateral mastectomies. Two patients died of unrelated causes prior to two years;79 patients declined inclinic attendance due to COVID or competing comorbidities and 217 women had two-year cosmetic photographs and clinical assessments performed. Consensus of the photo-panel cosmesis at baseline was: Excellent: n=116 (53%), Good: n=102 (47%), Fair: n=1 (0.5%) and Poor: n=0. Consensus overall cosmesis at two years was: Excellent: n= 141 (65%), Good: n=78 (35%), Fair: n=0 and Poor: n=0. Most patients had either improved (n=168;77%) or no change (n=43;20%) in cosmesis at two years. No patient had cosmetic failure but 6 (3%) had a change from Excellent to Good at two years. Most patients reported either no (79%) or mild (21%) pain, with no moderate or severe pain. Two patients (0.9%) had Grade 2 fibrosis and five patients (2%) had visible telangiectasia that did not detract from overall cosmesis. Conclusion(s): APBI using 27 Gy in 5 fractions using a conformal IMRT technique, achieved excellent two-year cosmesis with minimal toxicity. The IBRT risk was comparable to the contralateral new breast cancer risk and to local recurrence rates of recently published early breast cancer trials. Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

3.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics ; 114(3):S6-S6, 2022.
Article in English | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-2036083

ABSTRACT

To report final results of a clinical trial of APBI using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to deliver 27 Gy in 5 daily fractions following breast conserving surgery (BCS) prospectively designed to assess the efficacy and cosmetic outcomes of a 1-week, APBI regimen among women with early breast cancer. Women ≥ 50 years, with lymph node-negative, ER positive, HER-2 negative breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), ≤ 3cm diameter, following BCS with margins ≥ 2mm, and excellent or good baseline cosmesis received 27 Gy in 5 daily fractions to the seroma plus 1 cm CTV and 0.7 cm PTV margins. Clinical photographs, patient and provider cosmetic scores, breast fibrosis, telangiectasia and pain were collected prospectively, prior to RT and at 6 weeks, 1 and 2 years after RT. The primary endpoint was the proportion of women who retained Excellent or Good cosmesis at 2 years using the EORTC Cosmetic Rating System. Cosmetic failure was deterioration from Excellent or Good to Fair or Poor. A panel of 5 radiation oncologists independently assessed the cosmetic photographs. Secondary endpoints were rates and grades of breast fibrosis, telangiectasia, breast pain, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBRT), overall (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and subsequent mastectomy. Efficacy outcomes were assessed at clinic visits and by review of charts. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02681107. A total of 298 patients were treated between April 25, 2016, and October 31, 2019. At a median follow up of 48 months, the 4-year OS was 98.5% (95% CI 96.1% - 99.5%) and BCSS was 99.7% (95% CI 97.6% - 99.9%). The 4-year IBRT rate was 3.3% (95% CI 1.1% - 6.4%). There were 10 contralateral breast events for a 4-year rate of 3.9% (95% CI 2.2% - 6.9%). There were 10 ipsilateral and 6 contralateral mastectomies. Two patients died of unrelated causes prior to 2 years;79 patients declined in-clinic attendance due to COVID or competing comorbidities and 217 women had 2-year cosmetic photographs and clinical assessments performed. Consensus of the photo-panel cosmesis at baseline was: Excellent: n=116 (53%), Good: n=102 (47%), Fair: n=1 (0.5%) and Poor: n=0. Consensus overall cosmesis at 2 years was: Excellent: n= 141 (65%), Good: n=78 (35%), Fair: n=0 and Poor: n=0. Most patients had either improved (n=168;77%) or no change (n=43;20%) in cosmesis at 2-years. No patient had cosmetic failure but 6 (3%) had a change from Excellent to Good at 2 years. Most patients reported either no (79%) or mild (21%) pain, with no moderate or severe pain. Two patients (0.9%) had grade 2 fibrosis and 5 patients (2%) had visible telangiectasia that did not detract from overall cosmesis. APBI using 27 Gy in 5 fractions using a conformal IMRT technique, achieved excellent 2-year cosmesis with minimal toxicity. The IBRT risk was comparable to the contralateral new breast cancer risk and to local recurrence rates of recently published early breast cancer trials. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

4.
OPEN CHEMISTRY ; 20(1):570-582, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1938472

ABSTRACT

Xinguan No. 3 has been recommended for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19);however, its potential mechanisms are unclear. This study aims to explore the mechanisms of Xinguan No. 3 against COVID-19 through network pharmacology and molecular docking. We first searched the ingredients of Xinguan No. 3 in three databases (Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology Database and Analysis Platform, Traditional Chinese Medicines Integrated Database, and The Encyclopedia of Traditional Chinese Medicine). The active components and their potential targets were predicted through the SwissTargetPrediction website. The targets of COVID-19 can be found on the GeneCards website. Protein interaction analysis, screening of key targets, functional enrichment of key target genes, and signaling pathway analysis were performed through Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes databases, Metascape databases, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway databases. Finally, the affinity of the key active components with the core targets was verified by molecular docking. The results showed that five core targets had been screened, including MAPK1, NF-kappa B1, RELA, AKT1, and MAPK14. Gene ontology enrichment analysis revealed that the key targets were associated with inflammatory responses and responses to external stimuli. KEGG enrichment analysis indicated that the main pathways were influenza A, hepatitis B, Toll-like receptor signaling pathway, NOD-like receptor signaling pathway, and TNF signaling pathway. Therefore, Xinguan No. 3 might play a role in treating COVID-19 through anti-inflammatory, immune responses, and regulatory responses to external stimuli.

5.
J Hosp Infect ; 2020 Apr 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-116798
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL